Malala Yousafzai And Her Problematic Stance

Examining Malala Yousafzai’s Controversial Positions

We all know Malala Yousafzai, the young Pakistani who went on to fight for education and win the Nobel Prize. As an inspiring figure and influential female advocate for women’s empowerment and education, Malala Yousafzai has always been at the forefront of justice and promising quality education to everyone, but recently she has been making headlines for all the wrong reasons. So what’s the matter? Why is it that Malala Yousafzai is constantly scrutinised and that too adversely this time?

Malala Yousafzai And Silence On Palestinian Cause

The online trolling started back in October after 7 October when Israel retaliated and responded massively to Palestine and killed many Palestinians, it was after this that Israel bombarded the entire region and killed innocent lives.

While the news was media were busy manipulating the news to facilitate zionist propaganda it was amidst all this that people started to question where is Malala. Malala remained silent for days after which she tweeted with a very neutral tweet condemning the attack and not mentioning Israel for its war crimes.

It was then that the hate train started against Malala as many people started asking her to take and moral standing on the issue. Amidst all the outrage, Malala stood to her lukewarm statements and later pledged to donate to Palestine but still, there was no particular green signal and no proper statement from her side. This made people even more upset as many claimed that she was a “Western puppet”.

Malala Yousafazai And Her Collaboration With Hilary Clinton

It was earlier this week when Malala Yousafzai announced that she’ll be part of the Broadway show “Suffs” which will be produced by Hillary Clinton. Hillary Clinton announced that she’ll be part of the Broadway musical along with Malala which was originally dedicated to suffrage and follows the struggle for women’s right to vote.

Amidst all this, Malala was brought under fire once again as many people are now questioning Malala’s deafening silence on the struggle of Palestinian women while she continues to work. Furthermore, her collaboration with Hillary Clinton has also raised many eyebrows as Hillary is seen multiple times defending and propagating Zionist propaganda whilst being completely silent for the besieged Palestinians.

This collaboration and Malala Yousafzai’s silence have enraged many people as one user writes on Twitter that,

“Malala we have supported you for far too long but this has disappointed us all”

Many people are also questioning Malala’s double standards as she collaborates with Hillary Clinton who was the former secretary of state who supported the CIA drone wars that killed and many countless lives in Northern Pakistan, destroying access to education; a former SoS who is actively supporting the genocide in Gaza right now.

Conclusion

While we patiently wait and watch Malala speak something for the besieged Palestinians, we wonder that were we manipulated by Malala’s Janus face all along. Her silence over matters like these is disappointing and aggrandizing but regardless of that we still wait.

Examining Malala Yousafzai’s recent controversy, it is clear that she has faced a great deal of criticism and doubt about her morality and allegiances due to her silence on a number of important subjects, most notably the Palestinian struggle. Many people who once viewed her as an unflinching fighter for justice and education have been disappointed by her moderate remarks and lack of clear denunciation of actions by organisations like Israel.

Moreover, her association with individuals like as Hillary Clinton, who are viewed as either complicit or endorsing policies that run counter to Malala’s principles, has sparked additional apprehension over her reliability and honesty as an international advocate.Many people maintain faith that Malala would eventually address these concerns and reassert her dedication to universal justice and equality in spite of the disappointment and scrutiny she has received. Her acts, however, continue to spark discussion and introspection about the difficulties of activism and the roles that powerful people have in mediating international issues until such a time as clarity becomes apparent.